Wow.. I didn’t know that
File under : things I wasn’t taught in school
Reblog the hell out of this everyone.
It’s like you guys want to be outraged and offended.
Maybe it’s just me but she looks more green than white. Shrug.
Feminists PLEASE stop telling people that don’t identify as feminists or who are critical of feminism they don’t know what it is. Stop dismissing misandrists as just a few loud radicals on tumblr. Start taking accountability for your movement.
Those “wrong feminists” that we’re supposedly talking to that gave us a bad view of feminism? Those wrong feminists are the ones making the fliers that feminist organizations put up on college campuses and hand out at rallies and slutwalks that say “Men Can Stop Rape”, perpetuating the idea that rape is a gendered issue and erasing the male rape victims that outnumber female victims in the US.
Your Very Bad Post has been read and graded. You can find your grade here.
One of your main arguments is that rape is gendered because people convicted of rape are exceedingly male. That’s interesting. If the definition of rape is “vaginal, anal or oral penetration” that means rape can only be perpetrated by a female if she uses an object. Forced envelopment is classified as sexual assault.
Nice intellectual dishonesty, you look only far enough to confirm your biases and then stop. Should I expect more of you?
You next nitpick my use of the word “misandrist.” That’s a non sequitur. Nothing in my post said anything about “male oppression” and you bring it up out of nowhere. Sexism doesn’t hinge on oppression, I don’t care what your college professor told you.
Furthermore, men are raped more than women throughout America.
You can instantly display how much of a shitty human being you are by arguing that it’s other men committing these prison rapes, so somehow rape is still an issue that predominately affects women and is thus a gendered issue and not a crime issue. Or you can say how prisoners are convicted criminals and thus deserve it as part of their “punishment” as feminists have told me before. Either way you’ll be an absolute shitbag.
And you’re saying people being more concerned with keeping people from offering any criticism of feminism than addressing the sexism rampant in the movement is not a problem in feminism? That’s interesting. You know, making it taboo to criticize a movement/organization/faction/etc is a popular staple of tyrannies. Stalin. Hitler. Kim Jong-Il."trans women exist lmao""even then people with the "male" karyotype don’t even always have that upper body strength there’s so little validity to saying this it’s insane"
First of all, it is possible for one to be referring to someone’s biological sex when they say “men.” Secondly, it’s estimated transgender people make up no more than 5% of the global population. [Source]
And finally, have you noticed that citing womens’ fear walking down the street being that a man will overpower her and forcibly rape her is rooted in the general knowledge of people of the male sex typically having more upperbody strength than people of the female sex. A person’s gender identity has nothing to do with it, and bringing up the existence of men with less upperbody strength is nothing short of a desperate attempt to derail.
The fact is the campaign is spoken in gendered language, and it’s supported by the posters that depict numerous men posing with their girlfriends or boyfriends, testifying that they will not use their superior strength to harm their significant other.
Honestly I didn’t even read the rest of your shitty dumb as fuck notes, so you can go fuck yourself. You’re intellectually dishonest and live on a diet of confirmation bias. If you felt like actually challenging your own knowledge at any point you’d stop nitpicking wording (which anyone with half a brain could comprehend, and it’s blatantly obvious to anyone with eyes you’re going out of your way to misinterpret things) and actually challenge my points then you could feel free to engage me further.
And not with this stupid trend of grading peoples’ blog posts like it’s a fucking high school essay. Some passive aggressive holier-than-thou bullshit like your shit doesn’t stink all the while slobbering logical fallacies all over my post like it’s nobody’s business. I’m not obligated to provide you with links when I’m expressing my thoughts, I’m not obligated to use MLA formatting and thorough explain every aspect of my argument so you don’t have to bother your poor little self with a google search and go beyond the facts you already accept close to your heart as absolute truth. You’re so desperate to “debunk” people who oppose you that you’re resorting to being an annoying little troll rather than face the fact that someone might actually have good reasoning to be against your toxic fucking movement.
If you have something of substance to say, comment it on my post. Otherwise go sit on a cactus.
She admits to framing him with another man yet they haven’t been arrested yet. And we’re just supposed to believe women who say they’ve been beaten and/or raped when shit like this happens all the time. Women like this are the reason why victims of domestic violence and rape are doubted. It’s not because of ‘rape culture’ — it’s because of women like this. [source]
And we’re just supposed to believe women who say they’ve been beaten and/or raped when shit like this happens all the time.
You’re officially a piece of shit. We don’t stop arresting murderers because some deaths are faked; we don’t stop people from claiming home insurance because some people fake it; we don’t ignore victims of child abuse because some kids cry wolf. It’s absolutely despicable (and in this context, sexist, as you specify only female abuse victims) to deny abuse victims help because other people lie about it.
When someone fakes their death it is usually to fraudulently collect insurance money or to avoid being captured by the law. However, these attempts at faking death are typically unsuccessful. People who fake their deaths also don’t implicate others as their murderers considering that would require a lot of police investigation which is something those who fake their deaths do not want. So they choose to frame their deaths up as accidental, suicidal, or as an unexplained disappearance.
Insurance fraud is investigated like all crimes are investigated but unlike murder or rape crimes the only victim in these cases are the insurance companies themselves which is why 41 states have their own fraud bureaus operated by law enforcement personnel.
In both of those examples there are no victims other than insurance companies. You have also minimized the seriousness of domestic violence and sexual assault by comparing it to fraud. And I’m the piece of shit?
When it comes to child abuse, you should really look into false memory and how children can be manipulated into accusing adults of abuse. Because of the 1980s child abuse hysteria, false memory is now considered in child abuse cases. So even child abuse claims are questioned whether they’re truthful or not though some still get though the investigating process and innocent people spend 40 years in prison. There have been 166 people exonerated since 1989 of child sex abuse, many who had already served up to 30 years in prison and many who were serving a life sentence. But hey, let’s just believe women and children on their word.
Now, it appears to me that you don’t have a brain which is why you thought I suggested that because women lie about domestic violence and sexual assault we then shouldn’t take them seriously though this is not what I was saying. What I said is that women like this are the reason why victims of domestic violence and rape are doubted. Feminists want people to just believe women on their word without any evidence or proper investigation. Though we can see in this story that women will go to great lengths to falsify their victimization in order to obtain money. Therefore, investigations, interrogations, and innocent until proven guilty are important pieces to figuring out whether an abuse or rape actually occurred. If feminists had it their way the ex-boyfriend would have been arrested, incarcerated, and she would have been able to use credit cards in his name.
So I never said victims should be denied help but somehow you interpreted it that way. Probably due to your lack of reading comprehension. Next time, perhaps you should try reading slowly and sounding the words out before you reblog with an obvious knee-jerk reaction.
Your response, fohfuu.
Did anyone notice that the world’s biggest, most powerful “Gender Equality Movement” has very little men?
…And tells the men in the movement that their job is to sit down, shut up, and support women?
…And has spent jillions calling rape and abuse “violence against women”?
But please, Amy - I mean, Leslie - what point were you making about gender representation and discrimination?
And by the way, what color do you think this kettle is?
This does not even deserve the explanation you’ve provided. Everyone knows Amy Poehler is a massive feminist parrot and has no fucking clue about any of the social justice bullshit she swallows. What Gender equality organisation anywhere has more men than women? What domestic violence, sexual violence, or anything like that have more men than women? Most of the biggest have about 90% women.
it’s sad that people even need to make posts like this, honestly.